“Humans were genetically inclined to be intolerant of difference. They could overcome the inclination, but it was a reality of the Human conflict that they often did not.” —Octavia Butler
I’ve been binge reading Octavia Butler’s fantastic fiction. I can’t recommend it highly enough—its been a long time since I’ve so enjoyed an author’s work. The above is from her Xenogenisis Trilogy-CE* (Dawn, Adulthood Rights, and Amago) in which she presents a post-apocalyptic earth, where we find humans, alien Oankali, and human-Oankali hybrids. The Oankali saved the humans that remain—absent Oankali intervention, there would be no humans at all. That Oankali did not do this solely out of altruistic concern, but also so that they would have humans as genetic “trading partners.” The Oankali are a repeatedly and intentionally evolving species—they evolve by mixing their DNA with that of other species. Humans aren’t the first and won’t be the last. Some in the tale appear unable to grasp the incredible benefit the Oankali offer and become “resisters” seeking to maintain their biological humanity at all costs. They fear their species being lost completely. Indeed, the Oankali have (reversibly) altered humans to prevent non-hybrid procreation because they see a fatal destructive flaw in human biology—so destructive that they believe that absent intervention, the human race will self-destruct, just as it almost did before they arrived. The Oankali, though, offer what amounts to significantly improved and lengthened individual life for the remaining humans and their descendants, though not, admittedly, as biological humans.
Fear of the new and different is natural. Such fear can, of course, be life-preserving. It can’t though, be one’s only guide. Fortunately, fear never dominates everyone. Perhaps not even most. There are humans in Butler’s tale that live in peace with the Oankali with little fear. Most Christians don’t fear Muslims, most Americans don’t fear people in China or Russia, and most rural folks don’t fear city dwellers—or vice versa (for each pairing). Importantly, most democrats don’t fear republicans and most republicans don’t fear democrats. But we can all be better off if we increase understanding across the partitions that divide us.
If we do not at least try to better understand those we disagree with, the social and political landscape will only get worse. The last century and a half has been humanity’s most prosperous. The vast improvements to human life owe much to greater freedom to trade with those foreign to us, geographically and culturally. That trade was partly preceded by, included, and followed by, discourse. Absent discourse, we separate from others, living in isolated pockets (or “bubbles”) with others like us. That is a recipe for stagnation—a New Dark Age where there is little dialogue between individuals across party lines, political borders, religions, and cultures. And with that, less trade and progress. We need more discourse that crosses all of those lines—and that will only happen with civility. Civil discourse may not be the engine of change, but it’s certainly a prerequisite thereof. Let’s have at it. Tell me why I’m wrong. Don’t tell me “because the so-and-so’s are beyond the pale;” tell me what we can do that would improve things other than engage in civil discourse that improves understanding. Don’t tell me I’m a so-and-so; tell me why I’m wrong about civil discourse, or what is needed for progress, or why we don’t need progress, or why we’re somehow better off without cross-border trade (geographically, culturally, religiously, politically).
In addition to leaving the comments open here—my first time doing so on RCL—I note a great new national attempt to improve understanding through civil discourse by the Braver Angels organization. For the last few years, Braver Angels (formerly Better Angels) has been putting “blues” and “reds” in dialogue with each other to great affect. They continue to do so, but have a new project meant to address the particular situation we now face. When the 2020 election is over, many of your friends, neighbors, coworkers, and relatives are going to be upset. Braver Angels hopes we can get reconciliation across the partisan divisions that have become so much less civil. They seek to increase civil discourse by encouraging both sides to reach out to each other to discuss how we should all treat one other. This can help us better understand each other—even those we vehemently disagree with. I’d encourage you to take seriously the Braver Angel’s “With Malice Toward None” Pledge and, their letter rejecting election related violence. Sign both now.
*Thanks to Christy Horpedahl for helping me make this a better post than it otherwise would have been.
CE*=RCL earns commissions if you buy from this link; commissions support this site.
2 thoughts on “An Appeal for Civil Discourse”
Good blog you’ve got here.. It’s difficult to find high-quality writing like yours nowadays.
I honestly appreciate people like you! Take care!!
Comments are closed.